William Blake’s “The Tyger,” from his 1794 collection Songs of Experience, stands as one of the most iconic and mysterious poems in the English language. Its powerful rhythm and striking imagery have captivated readers for centuries, yet the central question it poses – about the creator of such fearsome beauty – remains a subject of intense debate. What immortal hand or eye could frame the tiger’s fearful symmetry? Exploring the layers of symbolism and questioning within “Blake Tyger” reveals not just an inquiry into divine creation, but perhaps a deeper look into the nature of human imagination and experience.
Contents
The Mystery of the Fearful Symmetry
The poem immediately confronts the reader with the overwhelming presence of the tiger, “burning bright, / In the forests of the night.” This creature is not merely described; it is presented as a question, an enigma of power and terror. Its “fearful symmetry” suggests a terrifying perfection, a balance of beauty and danger that demands an explanation for its origin. Common interpretations often see the tiger as representing various powerful or dangerous forces – God’s wrath, the sublime aspects of nature, evil, or the terrifying reality of experience itself, contrasting sharply with the innocence represented by the lamb in Blake’s companion poem from Songs of Innocence. The sheer power of the image was such that, famously, it reportedly caused Bertrand Russell to faint as a child upon hearing it recited.
The Forge of Creation
Blake moves from describing the tiger to interrogating the process of its creation, employing vivid metallurgical and blacksmith imagery:
What the hammer? what the chain,
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? what dread grasp,
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?
This imagery is key to understanding the poem within the broader context of Blake’s complex mythological system. In Blake’s cosmology, the figure of Urthona is the blacksmith or architect, the creative force associated with the imagination and the subterranean realm. The tools listed – hammer, chain, furnace, anvil – are directly linked to Urthona’s forge, where forms are hammered into being from molten material.
Considering this, one powerful interpretation posits that the “immortal hand or eye” is not necessarily a distant, divine creator, but the human imagination itself. The tiger, with its terrifying energy and perfection, becomes a product of human creative power. Just as Urthona forges the material world and forms, the human mind creates concepts, images, and experiences, including the very idea and fear associated with the tiger. This perspective aligns with Blake’s emphasis on the primacy of the imagination as the true divine force within humanity. The fearful symmetry is framed not in a celestial workshop, but perhaps in the intense heat and effort of the mind’s own creative fire. When considering powerful human endeavors, one might ponder who wrote the white man’s burden, a text whose influence, however controversial, demonstrates the tangible impact of words forged by human hands and minds.
Illustration by William Blake for his poem 'The Tyger' from Songs of Experience, showing the poem's text alongside Blake's visual art.
Reason’s Surrender and the Tyger’s Birth
The poem continues to build its series of questions, leading to a particularly enigmatic stanza:
When the stars threw down their spears
And water’d heaven with their tears:
Did he smile his work to see?
Did he who made the Lamb make thee?
The image of “stars” throwing down their spears is often interpreted through Blake’s symbolism of Urizen, the embodiment of limited reason, law, and conventional thought. Urizen is frequently associated with starry systems, representing a cold, distant, and restrictive form of intellect. His “spears” can be seen as aggressive, divisive, or limiting thoughts and systems. The stars surrendering their weapons and weeping suggests a moment when rigid reason yields or fails.
If the tiger is a product of imagination (Urthona), its emergence might be connected to the moment when the dominance of restrictive reason (Urizen) is overcome or relinquishes control. When the rigid structures of purely rational thought break down, perhaps the more intense, fearful, and imaginative realities—the tiger—can fully manifest or be perceived. It’s a complex interplay: is the tiger created because reason failed, or does its fearful power cause reason to surrender? This dynamic explores the tension between different facets of the human psyche and the forces Blake saw at play in the universe. Exploring how different forms of thought and justification shape our world offers fascinating parallels; for instance, one might analyze how was the white man’s burden used to justify imperialism, seeing how specific ideologies can be forged and wielded to shape global narratives and actions.
The Lamb and the Tyger: A Question of Creator
The poem culminates with the powerful question that ties it back to Songs of Innocence: “Did he who made the Lamb make thee?” This is the core theological and philosophical puzzle. Can the same creator be responsible for both the gentle, innocent lamb and the terrifying, experienced tiger? If the tiger is a divine creation alongside the lamb, what does this say about the nature of God? If, however, both are creations of the human imagination or different facets of human experience, the question shifts to the duality within humanity itself – our capacity for both innocence and terrifying power, gentleness and fearful symmetry. The poem doesn’t provide an answer but forces the reader to confront the profound mystery of creation, duality, and the forces that shape existence and experience.
Blake’s “The Tyger” remains potent because it resists simple explanation. By using rich symbolism rooted in his unique mythology, Blake transforms a simple inquiry about a fearsome animal into a deep meditation on creativity, duality, and the forces, both internal and external, that forge reality. The “blake tyger” continues to burn bright in the forests of our minds, challenging us to ask what hand—or imagination—could frame such fearful symmetry.